This is the expectation on Union St because there is no cycle path. Children are wobbly on bicycles and do not always cycle in a straight line. Buses are huge compared to bicycles, especially children’s bicycles. Visibility is also poor for bus drivers. Children are slow cyclists and cannot keep up with traffic. Children on bicycles in the bus lane are a nuisance to bus drivers and are putting their own lives at risk.
We want to encourage children to ride their bicycles to address the obesity crisis, traffic congestion, pollution, and climate change, but the city council needs to give them road space away from cars, trucks, and buses.
Cycling infrastructure returns more to the community than it costs to build. A study commissioned by the City of Sydney found for each $1 that was spent on cycling infrastructure, $3.88 was returned to the community through improvements to health, pollution, and congestion –
A University of Auckland study found the benefits of spending on cycling infrastructure were 10-25 times greater than the costs. – http://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/1307250/
A recent Finnish study also found benefits outweighed costs even in the worst case scenario:
Compare this to building roads for cars and in all cases the costs outweigh the benefits.
For why building new roads is not cost effective see the theory of induced demand:
For something more academic try:
Sometimes adding additional roads to a network can impede the flow of traffic. See Braess’ paradox for more:
If you live in Aberdeen please write to the city council and ask them to provide space away from traffic for children to ride their bikes.
1 thought on “Why does the Aberdeen city council think it’s acceptable for children to cycle in the bus lane?”
The great god (or goddess?) of motorised transport?