Cycling infrastructure benefits everyone

The Aberdeen City Council has really been getting a hammering from residents in Aberdeen about the installation of a segregated bike path at the beach. I can see what an uphill battle it is for cycling here. Some of the comments I’ve seen are extraordinary. One woman wrote:

okay well I’ll carry on as normal then and block the cycle path with my car door and the cyclists can go up on the pavement making the cycle path redundant

This just confirms the stereotype in the cartoon of the selfish motorist.

And there’s all the usual comments about cyclists not paying road tax and therefore undeserving of infrastructure. I’ve started telling people they should ask for a refund if they’re paying road tax because it was abolished in 1937. It’s exhausting seeing that myth repeated over and over.

And then other people tell me cyclists are a danger to themselves, as though we deserve to be hit and killed by their vehicle. And another comment, “I don’t want a safe place in town for my kids to cycle.” Because of course if we don’t want something for ourselves then no one else should be allowed it either, right? It’s like saying I have no use for wheelchair ramps at supermarkets, libraries, and health centres, therefore I don’t support the construction of any of these things. That would be a very selfish and unreasonable position to take. I fully 100% support accessibility access in all spaces.

One of my jobs at work is to bring our product up to AA web accessibility standards. Something I’ve learnt about designing for accessibility is that when you make something good for an extreme user like someone in a wheelchair, you inadvertantly benefit other groups as well. Ramps benefit not just wheelchair users but mums and dads with prams, elderly people who may have difficulty navigating steps, and small children. It’s called universal design.

Cycle paths are a bit like this because you don’t have to be a cyclist yourself to benefit from cycling infrastructure. Cycling infrastructure can be used by people on mobility scooters, skateboards, rollerblades, scooters, even wheelchairs. Indirectly cycling infrastructure benefits everyone through reduced greenhouse gas emissions, cleaner air, lower health care costs, lower road maintenance costs, and less traffic.

It is distressing to see some people put their own convenience before the safety of sons, daughters, mother, fathers, grandparents, aunts and uncles on bikes but I take comfort from movements of the past like women’s rights and the anti-slavery movements. I have no doubt that the past Rachel would have been up to her neck in those movements too and probably would have faced similar hostility albeit not in an online environment.  We can do this. It will just take time and perseverance.

15 responses to “Cycling infrastructure benefits everyone”

  1. It’ll be like this from a vocal minority until it just becomes normal to consider other more vulnerable road/path users within transport regulation. Happened with seat belts, motorcycle helmets, air bags etc. A huge step forward would be presumed liability, protecting the most vulnerable. I’ve noticed when cycling in Europe how more considerate drivers are and I believe this may be because of presumed liability. I’ve recently reported some close passes with video evidence and have been pleased by the supportive police response as well.

    • That’s promising. Do you think things are changing here now? It doesn’t seem that way from where I’m sitting but maybe they were much worse in the past.

      • During the more severe lockdown period I had only 1 incident in several months, there’s been a bit more since things eased, but subjectively it seems better. It might be that the TV adverts re close passes are having some effect.

  2. I’m glad your company takes accessibility seriously.
    People who go online to vent aren’t representative of the population as a whole. They are generally so negative. I don’t know if you have any online mums’ groups based around school…
    The good thing is that the council has taken action. It was a bit rubbish for cycle lanes in Brighton when I came down here but much improved now – people get used to things after a while.

    • Yes, you’re right about people online and mum’s groups are the worst. It is good the council has taken action but so disheartening to see what is an unreasonable and almost hysterical reaction.

  3. Hear hear!! It’s my opinion that cars and bicycles are like cats and dogs ..
    Sometimes when trained well they can just about tolerate each other; the rest of the time it’s just war. We need more cycle lanes and better education starting in the driving lessons. In France they at least move right over to the other lane to overtake. In London, they are disgusting and with attitude and here in New York, I’m not entirely sure that a) the roads are fit for purpose, b) the cars are fit for purpose and c) that many have even taken a test. Life needs to change for so many reasons. Climate, exercise to reduce the strain on the NHS and so on …. oooooh yes I’m having a rant, but I do so agree with you! Very best wishes, and apologies for the tantrum! Katie

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: