A world of giant snakes

Once upon a time, crocodiles roamed the arctic1, along with turtles, fish and other warmth-loving creatures. How do we know this? Because bones from these animals have been found there. The bones of a Champsosaur – an extinct crocodile-like animal – were found in the high Canadian Arctic by researchers from the University of Rochester more than a decade ago. Footprints belonging to a pantodont, also warmth-loving and not unlike a hippopotamus, have also been found2 along with a variety of subtropical plants. This suggests the Arctic once had a climate not unlike that of Florida today, where the temperature did not drop below freezing, where there was no snow, no ice and the sea surface temperatures were over 23oC.3

Antarctica has been similarly warm in the past. Evidence of coniferous forests were first discovered by Ernest Shackleton and his team in 19084. These can be dated from between 100 to 40 million years ago, when the continent was in much the same place as it is today, thereby excluding theories of continental drift.

There is evidence that the mid-latitudes were also much warmer – 10oC warmer – and wetter than now, according to Matt Huber5 and that sea surface temperatures in the tropics were extremely high: 32-36oC6.

A few years ago the fossilised remains of a giant snake were found in Colombia. The size of this snake dwarfs everything Hollywood has dreamt up with conservative estimates putting it at 13 metres long and weighing around a tonne7. What is significant though, is that its size is indicative of a much warmer climate: 3-4 degrees warmer than the same location is today.

What made the Earth so warm during this time? The best explanation is atmospheric CO2, which was much higher 50 million years ago: >1000ppm8. CO2 warms the Earth by effectively installing a layer of pink batts around our planet. Heat from sunlight comes in but cannot radiate back into space as readily.

Earth’s neighbour, Venus, has an atmosphere choked with CO2 and a stifling surface temperature of 460oC. But it wasn’t always this way. Venus is thought to have once had liquid water and a livable climate but fatally fell victim to the ‘runaway greenhouse effect’. Atmospheric CO2 increased, causing water to evaporate, the increase in water vapour – also a greenhouse gas – in turn caused an increase in temperature until all the water boiled away leaving the surface hot enough to melt lead9.

Could this ‘runaway greenhouse effect’ occur here on Earth? A recent paper, “The runaway greenhouse”10, explores just this scenario. They think this catastrophe is unlikely here but there is a caveat. Our current understanding of the physics is weak and so the authors cannot completely rule out this possibility. They also note that if we are wrong about our planet avoiding this “ultimate climate emergency”, then our only option will be geoengineering: giving Earth a hat and some sunscreen to deflect sunlight or in the more distant future, altering Earth’s orbit.

Geoengineering is essentially giving humans a dial to control global temperature. One proposal is to inject the stratosphere with sulphates which will cool the planet by reflecting incoming sunlight. A sort of planetary sunscreen. David Keith, Professor of Applied Physics at Harvard University thinks we need to research this area big time, right now11.

What if we did have a temperature dial for Earth? Who gets to control it? Many people own cars which allow the occupants to independently set the temperature of each other. The person in the driver’s seat can set a different temperature to the person in the passenger’s seat and so on. Such is the amount we disagree on what constitutes a comfortable temperature that people sitting together inside a car can’t even agree. I think probably David Keith is right, this area needs to be explored, but I am slightly worried by the prospect of a heat-loving citizen of Greenland (if he/she exists) wanting to set the temperature higher than a cold-loving Celt like myself. Or what if something goes wrong and the reverse happens, plunging us into another ice-age?

What about sea level? The sea is expected to rise by 1m over the next century from melting ice. Some people, like James Hansen – former NASA scientist – thinks it could be as high as 5m12. Animals can also give us evidence here but this time, the animals are living. Two separate but identical populations of octopi were recently found living in Antarctica on either side of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet (WAIS)13. This particular species does not venture far from home and would not have been able to swim the 10,000km of ocean to get to the other side. This indicates that the WAIS has collapsed in the past, allowing the octopi to swim the much shorter distance through the middle. The West Antarctic Ice Sheet is melting fast and is expected to contribute 3.3m of sea level rise14.

To say we have no alternative but to continue our dependence on fossil fuels is to have very low expectations of ourselves. This is a defeatist argument. Human innovation, creativity and scientific curiosity gave us the power to light our homes in the first place. It is surely a much more smaller hurdle to stop digging up fossil fuels and foster alternative energy sources than it is to engineer a comfortable climate for 9 billion people, find new homes for the vast swarms of people unable to live in their habitat and to keep the sea from flooding our coasts and rivers. The defeatist argument also ignores some of the innovative solutions already in existence, for instance:
1. A power station in east London plans to power 39,000 homes from the cooking fat deposited in London’s sewer system15.
2. Methane from a rubbish dump in the Phillipines is giving local residents free power16.
3. A British company, Blue Energy, recently announced plans to build Africa’s largest solar power plant in Ghana17.
3. 84% of primary energy use in Iceland comes from renewable sources18.

Our ancestors gave us power to light our homes and the technology to transport us quickly to far away places. Let’s give our descendants a power and transport sector of which they can be proud and more importantly, a habitable planet.

1.Fossil evidence tells of Arctic warming. University of Rochester. Currents.

2.‘Arcitc hippo’ hints at a once-balmy North Pole. New Scientist.

3.Subtropical Arctic Ocean temperatures during the Palaeocene/Eocene thermal maximum. Sluijs et al. Nature, 2006.

4.When crocodiles roamed the Arctic. New Scientist. 2008.

5.What past climates say about co2 and warming – Matt Huber

6.Progress in greenhouse climate modeling. Matthew Huber 2012

7.Giant snake fossil heats up climate debate. Financial Times. 2009.

8.Persistent near-tropical warmth on the Atlantic continent during the early Eocene epoch. Pross et al. Nature. 2012

9.Venus Greenhouse Effect.

10.The runaway greenhouse: implications for future climate change, geoengineering and planetary atmospheres. Goldblatt C, Watson AJ.

11.Research on Global Sunblock Needed Now. David W. Keith, Edward Parson and M. Granger Morgan

12.James Hansen: Why I must speak out about climate change

13.Persistent genetic signatures of historic climatic events in an Antarctic octopus. Strugnell et al. 2012

14.Reassessment of the Potential Sea-Level Rise from a Collapse of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet. Bamber et al. 2009

15.Fatbergs: Burning fat and oil to generate London power.

16.Phillipines turns trash into free energy windfall.

17.Africa’s largest solar PV plant.

18.Icelandic National Energy Authority.

9 Replies to “A world of giant snakes”

  1. Rach, You spend a lot of time focusing on these things and what is happening on/to the earth/universe. Are you just pondering various things, or are you genuinely anxious about it?

    1. I have become obsessed with global warming recently but not anxious. I can remember learning about it in high school so it’s not that I’m only just aware of it. But a family member has recently brought to my attention the huge fossil fuel funded think tanks that are fighting hard to create doubt in the public and to denigrate the science.

      The very first article about the risks of rising atmospheric CO2 appeared in the NYTimes in the 1950s and nothing much has happend since then except that we are producing more and more CO2 and the rate of increase is accelerating. It’s as though the scientists have been standing there saying “blah, blah, blah, blah, blah”. So, I just thought I’d add my voice to those already trying to get the message through, because it just isn’t getting through.

  2. I was thinking about this recently too. Your blog is getting more and more interesting 🙂 (not that it wasn’t before either!!)

    1. Thank you! I am very curious about what a warmer world will be like and the answers lie in the past, when the world has been warmer before.

      1. I liked your post. Interesting and thoughtful. I agree that understanding the future evolution of our climate requires looking at the past. A common claim, however, is that finding some point in the past that was as warm as it is today somehow invalidates claims that we need to be concerned about anthropogenic global warming. There are at least two problems with such a claim. One is that you need to understand what caused past warming. There can be perfectly natural reasons why there might have been a period of warming. What we’re concerned about now is the implications of continually adding CO2 to the atmosphere. It’s not so much the temperatures today that concern us, it’s the temperature in the future that concerns us. The other issue with this claim is that even if there is a period in the past that was as warm as it is today, the world we live in today is very different to that of the past. The population is higher than it’s ever been and how we survive is very different. We need to consider how we can provide for the world’s population if global temperatures do continue to increase.

        I must say, that I completely agree with your latter point about there being no alternative. We continually develop new and amazing technology and the idea that some think that we can’t do anything about rising CO2 levels is absurd. I would add that I think there are very good economic reasons for trying to develop new technologies. Investing in research and development has almost always lead to increased economic growth and if you can do this together with finding ways to reduce our dependence on fossil fuels, the impact would be huge.

      2. The other problem with assuming anthropogenic warming is nothing to be concerned about on the basis that it has been warm before, is that when change happens naturally, it happens very slowly. The pace of change we are presently causing is rapid and unprecedented and gives us and the rest of Earth’s inhabitants very little time to adapt. And who wants to live in a world with giant insects and reptiles? Not I.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s